Our approach
How We Review Products
Last updated ยท 2026-09-12
Start with the exact product
We identify the product, flavor, size, model or configuration covered by the review. Where evidence is lot-specific, we record the lot. Another product from the same brand does not inherit the decision. A collection qualifies only within the explicitly listed boundaries.
Review the formula and its context
We examine ingredients or materials, relevant sourcing, manufacturing and processing. We consult official labels, product pages, FAQs and supporting documents. An unresolved ingredient source can prevent ingredient approval even when the ingredient name looks acceptable. Missing contaminant reports are assessed separately.
Follow the evidence route
We look for product reports, certificates, testing portals and lot or QR-code systems. We distinguish a manufacturer's claim, an accessible report and a result we have actually reviewed. Each important conclusion should be traceable to a source. Category-specific material, performance or safety requirements still apply.
Make the selection useful
We look for useful differences between qualifying products: how you would use them, their availability, transparency and practical value. Featured choices offer a starting point. Reviewed brand ranges show other named products that qualify. Commercial viability may help distinguish equally qualifying options, but commission size cannot repair a failed ingredient rule or earn verification.
Keep the decision reviewable
Every public record should show its scope, status, evidence limitations and review date. New formulas, reports or other material changes can reopen the review. The date reflects an actual review, not simply when a page was edited.